A story we've been returning to with some regularity, the U.S. Treasury bond market & U.S.-China economic relations, and especially currency valuation, returned to the headlines this week. And, for the first time, it was one of the top headlines both in the U.S. and in China. The proximate cause was Tim Geithner's statement to the Senate Finance Committee that President Obama thinks China has been “manipulating” its currency. Personally, I'm not sure what this means. Certainly, China has been managing the value of the RMB. Is that manipulating its value? At any rate, what's really at issue is the desire of many in the developed world for the RMB to be freely tradeable and for its relative value to be set by the market. The assumption in the West (and great swatches of the East as well, no doubt) is that the RMB will rise against the US Dollar, the Japanese Yen, the Euro, the Pound (if, indeed, the Pound could go much lower). This is desirable, from a US policy perspective, because it would make exports to China cheaper. Cheaper goods from the US means more sales to China, or so the reasoning goes. But it also means less Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) coming into China, as well as (in relative terms) cheaper investments in the US by China. In other words, The RMB, having hypothetically gone up in value against the Dollar, will buy more New York real estate, more government bonds, etc. It also means a few other things, of great concern to the Chinese: US Dollar holdings by the China Investment Corporation (China's Sovereign Wealth Fund) will go down. They've already gone down a bunch and further declines will bring more criticism from within China and, paradoxically, make further Chinese investment in the U.S. less politically attractive. In addition, current Chinese holdings of U.S. Treasuries will be cheaper in RMB terms or, stated differently but with the same essential financial meaning, interest rates will need to go up, as we've predicted, only more so. Already, since 2008 Year End, Treasury yields have risen. They bumped up a bit more this Friday after Geithner's remarks were made public. And Chinese newspapers led with the story meaning, at the very least, that China took notice.
There's nothing really new in this issue. China's friends as well as her critics in the U.S. have been warning for years -- and by that I mean at least since 1998 -- that the issue of currency values and the U.S. trade deficit with China would be an issue someday. Every year, it has seemed, those who have been doing the warning have looked like a combination of Chicken Little (of "The Sky is falling! The Sky is falling!" fame) and the Boy Who Cried Wolf. You can only warn so many times without the danger arriving before you're ignored and even perceived as a bit of a naive idiot. As the Chinese would say, if the weren't being polite, "Er Bai Wu" -- the Village Idiot! If, as the Chinese may fear, the era of the gentlemanly "Go Along to Get Along" policies of the Bush Administration are over, things will get interesting pretty quickly.
The irony for both parties is that they need each other in innumerable ways. Both China & the U.S. have serious economic problems and need to work together as allies to effectively deal with those problems. This requires both candor & practicality. The problems are real. To be genuinely and effectively dealt with, both sides will have to put sensitivities aside and grapple with the real-world issues. The Bush Administration made the "Global War on Terror" the measure of all things. This was not to the benefit of either China or the U.S. A more nuanced & honest relationship would be better for both.
Saturday, January 24, 2009
Thursday, January 22, 2009
The Tide Turns
As the world watched the Obama inauguration with a great sigh of relief, one group of observers, hidden away behind the vermilion walls of Beijing's "Zhongnanhai" seemed a bit nervous. We expect a bit of anxiety from the shrunken and increasingly disdained Republican minority in Congress as well as from those Investment Bankers that are still employed. With the Republicans, the worry is understandable; the voters have spoken and the verdict was a harsh one. Now that Henry P. is out of Washington, along with his lap dog Neel Kashkari, the American public can hope that there will be at least a little bit of accountability in the Big Bank Bailout. In all likelihood, the days of "no questions asked" cash gifts to both troubled & untroubled banks will end. To many knowledgeable observers, its not the bailout that is at issue anymore, but the lack of accountability for what amounts to windfall gifts.
But back to the official Chinese reaction: much has been made of the Chinese censorship of the translation of Obama's inaugural address. From my perspective, this is not very surprising and nothing new. Censorship is alive & well in the Peoples' Republic. But underlying the surface facts, as usual, is another reality that is more telling. Official China, indeed, does seem to be a bit nervous. The question is, "Why?" To some extent, its perfectly understandable. As the Chinese themselves have pointed out, U.S.-China relationships have been remarkably unruffled over the last eight years since the Hainan Plane Incident in 2001. The only real threat coming from Washington wasn't from the Bush Administration at all, but from Congress and was centered around trade relations and, in particular, the relative value of the Chinese Renminbi against the U.S. Dollar. Since that time, the Peoples Bank of China has allowed the RMB to appreciate by almost 22% (from July 2005 through October 2008, its apex). That is not an inconsiderable movement, in the world of currency values. This doesn't mean that the pressure for change won't return, but at least defenders of PBOC currency policy will have a more defensible position.
So what is it that makes some people here nervous? The answer lies, at least partially, in who Obama is & how he thinks. As the first African-American President, Obama has achieved something that is almost inconceivable to Chinese leaders. China, of course, is approx. 92% ethnically Han. The likelihood of a Chinese head of state being Mongolian or Zhuang or Manchu (as they were during the Qing Dynasty) is extremely remote. And even the Manchu Qing largely pretended to be Han while they reigned. Even less likely are those minorities better known to the outside world: Tibetans & Uighurs. The even remote possibility that this could happen in China causes anxiety for some Chinese. The second reason has to do with who Obama is, not what he is. And who he isn't. Obama is not a party hack. He has had only three years as a member of the U.S. Senate. He is best known as having been a community organizer as a young man; community organizers are not your basic insiders. Obama also symbolizes to many the hopes & aspirations of the common man, not often these days something the rich and powerful in China are sympathetic to. In his initial appointments, he chose people of proven ability, but also of independent mind who speak their minds without fear. Obama also, I believe, looks to the Chinese -- with their often simplistic understanding of the U.S. -- as a sort of American Cory Aquino, a manifestation of "People Power". And in Obama's case, sporting a success fueled by outsiders (women, African-Americans, Hispanics, Jews, etc.), by small financial contributions (not big corporate ones), and popularly elected, no less. Obama's campaign famously used state-of-the-art eTools -- Instant Messaging, Facebook, even the more prosaic email & Internet web sites that have become ubiquitous political resources in the worlds' democracies for years. For some of China's Han leaders, Obama's rise to leadership is as worrisome as an imaginary charismatic Tibetan or Uighur leader who might rise to power in China on a wave of public popularity among the Laobaixing, the Chinese masses.
It is Common Wisdom among close (and even casual) observers of U.S.-China relations that, whatever may be said during Presidential campaigns about China, after a switch in power things continue pretty much as they have been since Jimmie Carter normalized relations 30 years ago. I don't expect that to change and China's leaders shouldn't either -- even if the rhetoric heats up by a few degrees. But the tide of history has surely turned in U.S. politics. The whole world has, rightly, taken notice. If this moment is an indicator of the flow of world history, as I believe it is, then China's leaders are right to be a bit anxious.
But back to the official Chinese reaction: much has been made of the Chinese censorship of the translation of Obama's inaugural address. From my perspective, this is not very surprising and nothing new. Censorship is alive & well in the Peoples' Republic. But underlying the surface facts, as usual, is another reality that is more telling. Official China, indeed, does seem to be a bit nervous. The question is, "Why?" To some extent, its perfectly understandable. As the Chinese themselves have pointed out, U.S.-China relationships have been remarkably unruffled over the last eight years since the Hainan Plane Incident in 2001. The only real threat coming from Washington wasn't from the Bush Administration at all, but from Congress and was centered around trade relations and, in particular, the relative value of the Chinese Renminbi against the U.S. Dollar. Since that time, the Peoples Bank of China has allowed the RMB to appreciate by almost 22% (from July 2005 through October 2008, its apex). That is not an inconsiderable movement, in the world of currency values. This doesn't mean that the pressure for change won't return, but at least defenders of PBOC currency policy will have a more defensible position.
So what is it that makes some people here nervous? The answer lies, at least partially, in who Obama is & how he thinks. As the first African-American President, Obama has achieved something that is almost inconceivable to Chinese leaders. China, of course, is approx. 92% ethnically Han. The likelihood of a Chinese head of state being Mongolian or Zhuang or Manchu (as they were during the Qing Dynasty) is extremely remote. And even the Manchu Qing largely pretended to be Han while they reigned. Even less likely are those minorities better known to the outside world: Tibetans & Uighurs. The even remote possibility that this could happen in China causes anxiety for some Chinese. The second reason has to do with who Obama is, not what he is. And who he isn't. Obama is not a party hack. He has had only three years as a member of the U.S. Senate. He is best known as having been a community organizer as a young man; community organizers are not your basic insiders. Obama also symbolizes to many the hopes & aspirations of the common man, not often these days something the rich and powerful in China are sympathetic to. In his initial appointments, he chose people of proven ability, but also of independent mind who speak their minds without fear. Obama also, I believe, looks to the Chinese -- with their often simplistic understanding of the U.S. -- as a sort of American Cory Aquino, a manifestation of "People Power". And in Obama's case, sporting a success fueled by outsiders (women, African-Americans, Hispanics, Jews, etc.), by small financial contributions (not big corporate ones), and popularly elected, no less. Obama's campaign famously used state-of-the-art eTools -- Instant Messaging, Facebook, even the more prosaic email & Internet web sites that have become ubiquitous political resources in the worlds' democracies for years. For some of China's Han leaders, Obama's rise to leadership is as worrisome as an imaginary charismatic Tibetan or Uighur leader who might rise to power in China on a wave of public popularity among the Laobaixing, the Chinese masses.
It is Common Wisdom among close (and even casual) observers of U.S.-China relations that, whatever may be said during Presidential campaigns about China, after a switch in power things continue pretty much as they have been since Jimmie Carter normalized relations 30 years ago. I don't expect that to change and China's leaders shouldn't either -- even if the rhetoric heats up by a few degrees. But the tide of history has surely turned in U.S. politics. The whole world has, rightly, taken notice. If this moment is an indicator of the flow of world history, as I believe it is, then China's leaders are right to be a bit anxious.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
